Gram Panchayat|LGD 189583Directory record
Dare
Part of Koregaon block, Satara district.
No water profile is published for this place
Held back because place-identity-and-composition, population-and-settlements, drinking-water-service are not established for this place.
The Panchayat is listed so it can be found and reviewed. A profile is held back rather than published from evidence that cannot identify the place.
Groundwater, projected from the taluka
IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.
Koregaon taluka, by village subdistrict code.
Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.
Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.
The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.
Tanks and water bodies
Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.
7 water bodies are on the census return for this Panchayat: 6 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams, 1 tank. 7 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.
The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. None of them is named in the return, which reads as a structure register rather than a survey of tanks and lakes.
| Census class | Water bodies |
|---|---|
| Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams | 6 |
| Tank | 1 |
| Owned by | Water bodies |
|---|---|
| State WRD/State Irrigation | 6 |
| Co-operative | 1 |
Land and irrigation
Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.
of 39 ha total.
canal 0 ha, wells 0 ha, tanks 0 ha.
culturable waste; barren 8 ha, forest 0 ha.
Sources through the summer
Census 2011, reference year 2009.
3 source types were recorded for the year and 3 held through the summer months. None failed.
This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.
What is missing
4 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.
Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.
- place identity and composition
- place boundary
- population and settlements
- drinking water service
- drinking water source
- drinking water reliability
- drinking water quality
- current rainfall
- rainfall anomaly
- groundwater level observation
- groundwater level trend
- aquifer context
- catchment context
- water body condition
- waterway network
- public water works
- flood hazard
- observed flood events
- natural drainage
- wastewater service
- responsibility and action
These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.
- connected supply system
- surface water change
- river water quality
- engineered stormwater drainage
- wastewater treatment assets
- pollution pressure inventory
- measured water pollution
- coastal and estuarine
- current crop and irrigation state
- soil water context
- agricultural water system relation
- crop water demand
- agricultural water stress observation
- agricultural water pollution pressure
- composite priority score