Gram Panchayat|LGD 189761Water profile

Khutbav

Part of Man block, Satara district.

Watch

Tap coverage is incomplete

57.09 percent of 585 households report a tap connection.

57.09%
Households with a tap connection

334 of 585 households, across 6 habitations.

76.3%
Groundwater extraction, containing talukataluka projection

Man is assessed semi critical. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.

97.2 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-02 and 2026-09-01, modelled rather than gauged.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent is DataMeet's community digitisation of the 2001 Census village map (ODbL), joined to the 2011 codes and dissolved to each Panchayat's member villages, so the place on the map is the place the register describes.

LGD Panchayat code
189761
Block
Man
District
Satara
Mapped area
1,516.613 ha
Centroid
17.7779, 74.7269
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the DataMeet polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is indicative (a 2001-era digitisation), not a survey boundary. The 5 small markers are the water bodies the First Census of Water Bodies recorded in this Panchayat's villages, at the coordinates its enumerators entered.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Chopadewasti1607070
Dubalwasti1406767
Kate-chougulewasti1893838
Khutbav2,10035099
Nanavare-shinde-deokarwasti1603232
Nanavarewasti1532828

Groundwater, projected from the taluka

IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

semi-critical
taluka categorytaluka projection

Man taluka, by village subdistrict code.

76.3%
stage of extraction, talukataluka projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Man
containing revenue talukataluka projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Tanks and water bodies

Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.

5 water bodies are on the census return for this Panchayat: 5 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams. 5 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.

The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. None of them is named in the return, which reads as a structure register rather than a survey of tanks and lakes.

Census classWater bodies
Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams5
Owned byWater bodies
State WRD/State Irrigation5

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

1,008.45 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,540.4 ha total.

79.04 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 929.41 ha, tanks 0 ha.

278.62 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 3.9 ha, forest 224.52 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 3 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: tapTreated, tankPondLake.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

11 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (14)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water source
  • drinking water reliability
  • drinking water quality
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • public water works
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (15)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • connected supply system
  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score