Gram Panchayat|LGD 223742Water profile

Lakkapuram

Part of Modakkuruchi block, Erode district, in the Lower Bhavani sub-basin.

Not characterised

Containing taluk assessed semi critical

Modakurichi is assessed semi critical at 77.1 percent of extraction. This is containing-area context, not a measurement of this place.

100%
Households with a tap connection

3,111 of 3,111 households, across 23 habitations.

43
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well, River, Treated Surface Water

77.1%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Modakurichi is assessed semi critical. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

74.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

32d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-05. 265 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
223742
Block
Modakkuruchi
District
Erode
Mapped area
591.99 ha
Centroid
11.3123, 77.7662
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Amman Nagar1603232
C.s.i Colony3195757
Indira Nagar700130130
Kalaparaikadu4058181
Kamaraj Nagar3206464
Karattankadu Colony2,295450450
Kattur765156156
Kollukattumedu2154343
Komarapalayam3406868
Kumaran Nagar1202424
Kumarapalayam A D Colony3205555
Lakkapuram2,725521521
Nagaratchi Nagar1,900380380
Pudhuvalasu750187187
Pudu Vinayagar Nagar1202424
Roja Nagar3507070
Sanarmedu1,210233233
Selva Nagar951919
Solarpudhur2505050
Sullimedu651313
Transport Nagar660132132
Vinayagar Nagar4008080
Balusamy Nagar1,405242242

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water39
RiverSurface Water2
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water1
Open WellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

semi-critical
taluk categorytaluk projection

Modakurichi taluk, by centroid in taluk.

77.1%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Modakurichi
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 2 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

3 water bodies cover 1.9 ha here, the largest of them 1.2 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED2
DOSS1

Water-quality testing

265 samples between 2022-09-29 and 2026-08-05. 225 were taken at a source and 40 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202237
202331
202478
202575
202644

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

132.82 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 585.68 ha total.

132.81 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 117.42 ha, wells 15.39 ha, tanks 0 ha.

3.11 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 2.2 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score