Gram Panchayat|LGD 224697Water profile

Minnampalli panchamadevi

Part of Karur block, Karur district, in the Amaravathi sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 4,122 households report a tap connection, while Manmangalam is assessed over exploited at 109.0 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

4,122 of 4,122 households, across 22 habitations.

44
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well, River

109.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Manmangalam is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

71.2 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

9d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-28. 338 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224697
Block
Karur
District
Karur
Mapped area
1,728.075 ha
Centroid
10.9951, 78.1141
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Ambalagoundanpudur1775959
Arasucolony2,190980980
Aravankattur330110110
Ganapathipalayam993333
Goundanpudur2859595
Kallipalayam666251251
Karunkal Colony3448686
Kattur (rajive Nagar)1866262
Minnampalli1,688447447
Panchamadevi2,336584584
Panchamadevi Agraharam784040
Panchamadevi Harijan Street882298298
Panchamadevi Pudur1806060
Pathinarukal Mandapam1745858
Periyagoundanpudur1806060
Pillagoundanpudur2889696
Poonthottam1903535
Samiyan Thottam842828
Samiyar Thottam265112112
Sankaranpalayam849283283
Santhanakalipalayam1,112297297
Seethakattur1444848

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water40
RiverSurface Water2
Open WellGround Water2

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Manmangalam taluk, by centroid in taluk.

109.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Manmangalam
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 3 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

4 water bodies cover 3.3 ha here, the largest of them 1.3 ha. The register names 4 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC4

Water-quality testing

338 samples between 2023-01-08 and 2026-08-28. 204 were taken at a source and 134 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202365
2024151
202587
202635

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • historical water access
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • historical agricultural baseline
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score