Neer Vazhvu

Gram Panchayat|LGD 224743Water profile

Andankoil east

Part of Thanthoni block, Karur district, in the Amaravathi sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 7,340 households report a tap connection, while Manmangalam is assessed over exploited at 109.0 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

7,340 of 7,340 households, across 19 habitations.

45
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well, Open Well, River

109.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Manmangalam is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

70.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

30d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-07. 404 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224743
Block
Thanthoni
District
Karur
Mapped area
1,073.721 ha
Centroid
10.9661, 78.0532
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Andankoil Pudur2,252610610
Chettipalayam2209696
Chettipalayam-h2058585
Chinnandan Koil3,384917917
Chinnandankoil H521152152
N.k.nagar2656868
Periyar Nagar H1,923542542
Puthucolony1654848
Rajivganthi Nagar916305305
Ram Nagar North1,542323323
Ramagoundanpudur810270270
Reddipalayam2,223602602
Rottukadai--h610203203
Sanjai Nagar465115115
Saraswathi Nagar3,444851851
Selva Nagar1,445480480
State Bank Colony2,378671671
Vadivel Nagar3,296893893
Vanigavalagam322109109

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water23
RiverSurface Water18
Infiltration wellGround Water3
Open WellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Manmangalam taluk, by centroid in taluk.

109.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Manmangalam
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 3 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

1 water body covers 0.1 ha here, the largest of them 0.1 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC1

Water-quality testing

404 samples between 2022-12-23 and 2026-08-07. 280 were taken at a source and 124 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20225
2023124
2024100
202599
202676

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • historical water access
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • historical agricultural baseline
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score
Back to Karur district