Gram Panchayat|LGD 224795Water profile

Karakuppam

Part of Bargur block, Krishnagiri district.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

81.44 percent of households report a tap connection, and Bargur is assessed over exploited at 104.8 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

81.44%
Households with a tap connection

1,496 of 1,837 households, across 20 habitations.

37
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well

104.8%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Bargur is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

107.7 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

27d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-22. 149 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224795
Block
Bargur
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
1,392.253 ha
Centroid
12.5777, 78.3515
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Ammeri42013099
Chinna Karakuppam632137137
Earget3809999
Emakkalnatham773189189
Gollapalli554124124
Gollapalli Kolla Kottai1163333
Gollapalli Sc Colony456114114
Gollapalli St Colony2867272
Gotletti821187156
Karakuppam1,176278175
Karakuppam St Colony220507
M G R Nagar108296
Nadar Kottai842525
Nallavenkatappanaickenkottai1214646
Onpathu Panamaram2265118
Pananthoppu1082929
Paraiyoor2586020
Ramasamy Nagar1402727
Salinayanapalli3898980
Uchangollai2896840

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water36
Infiltration wellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Bargur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

104.8%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Bargur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

5 water bodies cover 12.3 ha here, the largest of them 7.1 ha. The register names 2 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED3
NRSC2

Water-quality testing

149 samples between 2023-09-02 and 2026-08-22. 97 were taken at a source and 52 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202322
202447
202544
202636

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

505.56 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,463.14 ha total.

282.53 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 282.53 ha, tanks 0 ha.

60.1 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 63.42 ha, forest 129.13 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 5 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score