Gram Panchayat|LGD 224899Water profile

Pillariagraharam

Part of Kelamangalam block, Krishnagiri district.

Within limits

Universal taps on a source still within its limit

All 1,433 households report a tap connection and Denkanikottai remains assessed safe at 66.3 percent of extraction.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,433 of 1,433 households, across 11 habitations.

16
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

66.3%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Denkanikottai is assessed safe. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

104.4 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

28 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

2d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-09-16. 181 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224899
Block
Kelamangalam
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
137.276 ha
Centroid
12.5455, 78.0078
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Balinaickenhally5088686
Eachagoundanoor1041010
Kaduvarahalli664185185
Kallugankottai2634646
Koneri Agraharam983248248
Meda Agaraharam611
Metteri2755555
Mugalur1,324186186
Pillari Agraharam791219219
Sajjalapatti1,864353353
Singarapettai4654444

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water16

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

safe
taluk categorytaluk projection

Denkanikottai taluk, by centroid in taluk.

66.3%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Denkanikottai
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

4 water bodies cover 10.2 ha here, the largest of them 4.1 ha. The register names 4 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD3
WRD1

Water-quality testing

181 samples between 2022-11-15 and 2026-09-16. 115 were taken at a source and 66 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202212
202356
202433
202547
202633

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

499.23 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 868.54 ha total.

35.02 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 35.02 ha, tanks 0 ha.

0 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

7 source types were recorded for the year and 7 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score