Gram Panchayat|LGD 224963Water profile

Athimugam

Part of Shoolagiri block, Krishnagiri district.

Watch

Tap coverage is incomplete

46.94 percent of 1,570 households report a tap connection.

46.94%
Households with a tap connection

737 of 1,570 households, across 12 habitations.

27
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well

69.9%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Shoolagiri is assessed safe. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

81.9 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

10d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-09-08. 121 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224963
Block
Shoolagiri
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
1,837.189 ha
Centroid
12.7627, 77.9746
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Athetti2075843
Athimugam2,15352578
Elakkalbanda3277
Gollapalli490117117
Kariasandiram341313
Midithepalli620150118
Mukkalapalli36314312
Narasapuram870180159
Oddarpalayam1814829
Palavanapalli36511494
Punnagaram7041502
Thigataralapalli2636565

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water25
Open WellGround Water2

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

safe
taluk categorytaluk projection

Shoolagiri taluk, by centroid in taluk.

69.9%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Shoolagiri
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

10 water bodies cover 29.6 ha here, the largest of them 19.8 ha. The register names 8 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC7
AED2
TNRD1

Water-quality testing

121 samples between 2022-11-05 and 2026-09-08. 92 were taken at a source and 29 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20223
202310
202445
202533
202630

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

783.16 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,927.23 ha total.

139.35 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 135.69 ha, tanks 3.66 ha.

50.69 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 41.19 ha, forest 344.77 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 5 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score