Gram Panchayat|LGD 225097Water profile

Kundarapalli

Part of Veppanapalli block, Krishnagiri district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,363 households report a tap connection, while Krishnagiri is assessed over exploited at 101.2 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,363 of 1,363 households, across 13 habitations.

22
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

101.2%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Krishnagiri is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

97.8 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

15d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-09-03. 154 samples over 5 years, 1 recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
225097
Block
Veppanapalli
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
294.005 ha
Centroid
12.5714, 78.1826
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Bandapalli Kothur2735353
Chinna Guddur1884343
Chinna Kundarapalli963232
Guddur4169999
Kundarapalli838243243
Kundarapalli Kootu Road641150150
Nandupatti752020
Ondiyur1723131
Pachiganapalli742154154
Panchali Nagar1473434
Pethampatti2986666
Ramapuram698179179
Samanthamalai1,138259259

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water22

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Krishnagiri taluk, by centroid in taluk.

101.2%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Krishnagiri
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

5 water bodies cover 27.1 ha here, the largest of them 19.8 ha. The register names 5 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD3
NRSC1
WRD1

Water-quality testing

154 samples between 2022-09-10 and 2026-09-03. 115 were taken at a source and 39 at households.

1 were recorded unsafe.

YearSamples
20229
202323
202445
202528
202649

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

353.9 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,019.98 ha total.

102 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 21.62 ha, wells 34.31 ha, tanks 46.07 ha.

0 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 60.38 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score