Gram Panchayat|LGD 227725Water profile

U. Maramangalam

Part of Omalur block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 3,622 households report a tap connection, while Omalur is assessed over exploited at 108.9 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

3,622 of 3,622 households, across 22 habitations.

29
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, River, Treated Surface Water

108.9%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Omalur is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

143 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

30 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

19d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-18. 218 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227725
Block
Omalur
District
Salem
Mapped area
724.724 ha
Centroid
11.7599, 78.0104
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Anna Nagar Kalipatty729193193
Karuppanam Patty Thittu424107107
Karuppanampatti1,306349349
Karuppanampatty Puducolony2405757
Karuppanna Colony3679090
Karuppannampatti Anna Nagar724176176
Kattaperiyam Patty1,326330330
Kollar Colony3058383
Kooliyur Kattu Valavu2847474
Melakalipatty468113113
Milakaikaranur3668989
Palakattur734194194
Palikadai888217217
Panjakalipatti1,590406406
Pannangkadu532127127
Parapatti Chinnoor3227979
Pudur1,224320320
Thalayariyur1563737
U.maramangalam474122122
Unjakadu1,080271271
Valluvar Street518125125
Vellaiyan Theru2466363

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water19
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water9
RiverSurface Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Omalur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

108.9%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Omalur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

2 water bodies cover 0.7 ha here, the largest of them 0.7 ha. The register names 2 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC2

Water-quality testing

218 samples between 2023-01-06 and 2026-08-18. 189 were taken at a source and 29 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202363
202446
202564
202645

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • historical water access
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • historical agricultural baseline
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score