Gram Panchayat|LGD 227728Water profile

Amanikondalampatti

Part of Panamarathupatti block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 6,449 households report a tap connection, while Salem South is assessed over exploited at 145.5 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

6,449 of 6,449 households, across 24 habitations.

43
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Treated Surface Water

145.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Salem South is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

116.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

38d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-30. 228 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227728
Block
Panamarathupatti
District
Salem
Mapped area
275.121 ha
Centroid
11.6245, 78.1322
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Alagu Nagar752183183
Ammanikondalampatti1,873455455
Arasamarathukarattur2,219539539
Color Kadu534130130
Cylon Colony897218218
Indra Nagar / Nachiamman Nagar674164164
Kattian Kadu / Gk Karattur2,010488488
Kattu Kottai4079999
Kattur2,097509509
Madeshwaran Kadu444108108
Mallakka Nagar436106106
MEL COLONY3217878
Nadukaradu935227227
New Gandhi Nagar3668989
P.nattamangalam4,4291,0751,075
Pali Kadu / Kilakku Vattam1,928473473
Perumal Kovil Karattur457111111
Pillaiyarnagar626152152
S.nattamangalam2,484603603
Sithan Nagar3338181
Thaanankaradu902219219
Uthukulikadu741180180
Vattaparai1072626
Vinayagar Nagar560136136

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water27
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water16

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Salem South taluk, by centroid in taluk.

145.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Salem South
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

1 water body covers 19.9 ha here, the largest of them 19.9 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
DOSS1

Water-quality testing

228 samples between 2022-12-27 and 2026-07-30. 197 were taken at a source and 31 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20223
202374
202455
202549
202647

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • historical water access
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • historical agricultural baseline
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score