Gram Panchayat|LGD 227747Water profile

Vazhakkuttapatti

Part of Panamarathupatti block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,202 households report a tap connection, while Salem is assessed over exploited at 151.1 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,202 of 1,202 households, across 6 habitations.

14
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, River, Treated Surface Water

151.1%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Salem is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

144.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

30 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

7d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-30. 101 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227747
Block
Panamarathupatti
District
Salem
Mapped area
353.295 ha
Centroid
11.5518, 78.1184
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Aasarikadu768152152
Chinnavalakuttapatty392139139
Erumanaickenpalayam518198198
Koonanakadu356119119
Moongilleri744186186
Valakuttapatty1,408408408

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water8
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water5
RiverSurface Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Salem taluk, by centroid in taluk.

151.1%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Salem
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

3 water bodies cover 69.8 ha here, the largest of them 32.9 ha. The register names 3 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD3

Water-quality testing

101 samples between 2022-12-28 and 2026-08-30. 73 were taken at a source and 28 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20222
202335
202416
202523
202625

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

196 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 342.22 ha total.

39 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 39 ha, tanks 0 ha.

3.28 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 31.31 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score