Gram Panchayat|LGD 230159Water profile

Kiliyanallur

Part of Manachanallur block, Tiruchirappalli district, in the Mettur Reservoir to Noyyal confluence sub-basin.

Not characterised

Containing taluk assessed semi critical

Mannachanallur is assessed semi critical at 88.2 percent of extraction. This is containing-area context, not a measurement of this place.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,212 of 1,212 households, across 5 habitations.

19
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well, Shallow Tubewell

88.2%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Mannachanallur is assessed semi critical. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

77.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31, modelled rather than gauged.

13d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-18. 183 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
230159
Block
Manachanallur
District
Tiruchirappalli
Mapped area
745.379 ha
Centroid
10.8974, 78.6209
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Chettimangalam685197197
Kiliyanallur1,622496496
Neiveli920227227
Siliyathi722147147
Viathirupanchari495145145

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water12
Open WellGround Water6
Shallow TubewellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

semi-critical
taluk categorytaluk projection

Mannachanallur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

88.2%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Mannachanallur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 1 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Water-quality testing

183 samples between 2022-12-07 and 2026-08-18. 132 were taken at a source and 51 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202218
202331
202455
202546
202633

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

359.99 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 755.23 ha total.

336.2 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 300.62 ha, wells 35.58 ha, tanks 0 ha.

45.43 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0.23 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

8 source types were recorded for the year and 8 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score