Gram Panchayat|LGD 232173Water profile

Beemakulam

Part of Alangayam block, Tirupathur district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,055 households report a tap connection, while Vaniyambadi is assessed over exploited at 131.5 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,055 of 1,055 households, across 11 habitations.

131.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Vaniyambadi is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

116.4 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-02 and 2026-09-01, modelled rather than gauged.

27d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-10. 54 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
232173
Block
Alangayam
District
Tirupathur
Mapped area
1,285.377 ha
Centroid
12.5886, 78.8132
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Arunachalakollakottai3955757
Beemakulam434103103
Beemanvattam1906969
Bethodan Vattam1803434
Jarabendai1723131
Kavalur430157157
Malai Reddiyur450141141
Mantharakuttai2809191
Palaiyur3209595
Thimmarayavalasai654192192
Veearaghavavalasai2908585

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Vaniyambadi taluk, by centroid in taluk.

131.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Vaniyambadi
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 4 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

14 water bodies cover 19.8 ha here, the largest of them 4.9 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED13
TNRD1

Water-quality testing

54 samples between 2022-11-03 and 2026-08-10. 0 were taken at a source and 54 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20225
202340
20247
20262

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

898.28 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,282.77 ha total.

267.16 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 267.16 ha, tanks 0 ha.

16.25 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 66.73 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

7 source types were recorded for the year and 7 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

12 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (13)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water source
  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • public water works
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (15)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • connected supply system
  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score