Gram Panchayat|LGD 232379Water profile
Puthagaram
Part of Jolarpet block, Tirupathur district.
Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit
All 2,801 households report a tap connection, while Natrampalli is assessed over exploited at 165.5 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.
2,801 of 2,801 households, across 40 habitations.
Natrampalli is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.
31 rain days between 2026-08-02 and 2026-09-01, modelled rather than gauged.
Safe on 2026-08-03. 63 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.
Place and boundary
The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.
- LGD Panchayat code
- 232379
- Block
- Jolarpet
- District
- Tirupathur
- Mapped area
- 563.401 ha
- Centroid
- 12.5091, 78.5101
Habitations
JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.
| Habitation | Population | Households | Tap connections |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ad Colony | 736 | 197 | 197 |
| Ad Colony | 123 | 37 | 37 |
| Adiyathuran Vattam | 112 | 42 | 42 |
| Chinna Vellayan Vattam | 331 | 57 | 57 |
| Gobi Vattam | 104 | 24 | 24 |
| Kaliyappan Vattam | 155 | 20 | 20 |
| Kalnarsampatti | 1,253 | 230 | 230 |
| Kandagounder Vattam | 145 | 26 | 26 |
| Kannimara Kuttai | 327 | 103 | 103 |
| Karia Goounder Vattam | 123 | 27 | 27 |
| KARIAN VATTAM (NAIDU VATTAM) | 480 | 100 | 100 |
| Kizhkumedu | 452 | 133 | 133 |
| Konapattu | 506 | 141 | 141 |
| Kullan Vattam | 111 | 47 | 47 |
| Kuppanur | 453 | 101 | 101 |
| Manal Kollai | 321 | 81 | 81 |
| Mankanur | 350 | 87 | 87 |
| Mgr Nagar | 48 | 16 | 16 |
| Mudaliyar Vattam | 147 | 25 | 25 |
| Munirathinam Vattam | 130 | 36 | 36 |
| Muthagoundanur | 475 | 144 | 144 |
| Nandhi Vattam | 170 | 47 | 47 |
| Pallakollai | 105 | 18 | 18 |
| Parandapalli X Road | 137 | 45 | 45 |
| PATTUCHETTI VATTAM | 192 | 54 | 54 |
| Periaveettu Vattam | 276 | 82 | 82 |
| Puthagaram | 559 | 146 | 146 |
| School Vattam | 69 | 24 | 24 |
| Segan Vattam | 77 | 19 | 19 |
| Sudukattu Vattam(m.g.r Nagar) | 566 | 89 | 89 |
| Thammasenagounder Vattam | 175 | 28 | 28 |
| Thiruvalluvar Nagar | 171 | 51 | 51 |
| Thiruvankata Vattam | 326 | 97 | 97 |
| Thongan Vattam | 160 | 54 | 54 |
| Vadamalai Vattam | 178 | 47 | 47 |
| Vaniyambadiyan Vattam | 27 | 8 | 8 |
| Vannankuttai | 134 | 57 | 57 |
| Vengadathan Vattam | 226 | 61 | 61 |
| Vinayagaburam | 721 | 178 | 178 |
| Vinayagapuram | 130 | 22 | 22 |
Groundwater, projected from the taluk
IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.
Natrampalli taluk, by centroid in taluk.
Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.
Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.
The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 4 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.
Tanks and water bodies
Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.
5 water bodies cover 30 ha here, the largest of them 15 ha. The register names 3 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.
Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.
| Registered by | Water bodies |
|---|---|
| AED | 2 |
| WRD | 2 |
| TNRD | 1 |
Water-quality testing
63 samples between 2023-07-06 and 2026-08-03. 0 were taken at a source and 63 at households.
None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.
| Year | Samples |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 30 |
| 2024 | 7 |
| 2025 | 15 |
| 2026 | 11 |
Land and irrigation
Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.
of 842.45 ha total.
canal 0 ha, wells 113.71 ha, tanks 0 ha.
culturable waste; barren 0.16 ha, forest 0 ha.
Sources through the summer
Census 2011, reference year 2009.
6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.
This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.
What is missing
12 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.
Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.
- drinking water source
- drinking water reliability
- groundwater level observation
- groundwater level trend
- aquifer context
- catchment context
- water body condition
- waterway network
- public water works
- flood hazard
- observed flood events
- natural drainage
- wastewater service
These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.
- connected supply system
- surface water change
- river water quality
- engineered stormwater drainage
- wastewater treatment assets
- pollution pressure inventory
- measured water pollution
- coastal and estuarine
- current crop and irrigation state
- soil water context
- agricultural water system relation
- crop water demand
- agricultural water stress observation
- agricultural water pollution pressure
- composite priority score