Gram Panchayat|LGD 232600Water profile

Alinjikulam

Part of Natrampalli block, Tirupathur district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,915 households report a tap connection, while Vaniyambadi is assessed over exploited at 131.5 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,915 of 1,915 households, across 24 habitations.

3
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

131.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Vaniyambadi is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

125.4 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-02 and 2026-09-01, modelled rather than gauged.

8d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-29. 71 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
232600
Block
Natrampalli
District
Tirupathur
Mapped area
181.691 ha
Centroid
12.6959, 78.5770
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Alingikulam1,130212212
Badderi2605454
Balagounder Vattam3739393
Chettivettu Vattam4184949
Erikollai Vattam351105105
Kamatchi Vattam1434242
Kariankuttai1123939
Kootroad2524040
Malaiadi Varam (anna Nagar)405120120
Mandiri Vattam802525
Mel Alingikulam448173173
Mitlan Kuppam415118118
Naidu Vattam1663636
Nathikuppam2078282
Pallakollai Vattam293108108
Paraikollai3337575
Periakollai Vattam1214444
Perumal Koil Vattam2836565
Pudukollai1844141
Pudukolli Vattam1023030
Puliyamarathu Benda (barathi Nagar)2125454
Puthueri Kollai2786161
Thotti Kollai (ambedkar Nagar)3105151
Thumberi1,277198198

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water3

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Vaniyambadi taluk, by centroid in taluk.

131.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Vaniyambadi
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 4 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Water-quality testing

71 samples between 2022-10-12 and 2026-08-29. 27 were taken at a source and 44 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20221
20239
202418
202512
202631

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

406.39 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,327.69 ha total.

163.76 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 163.76 ha, tanks 0 ha.

90.5 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 75 ha, forest 460.15 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score