Gram Panchayat|LGD 229648Water profile
Vanagaram
Part of Villivakkam block, Tiruvallur district.
Universal taps on a source still within its limit
All 6,164 households report a tap connection and Poonamallee remains assessed safe at 67.9 percent of extraction.
6,164 of 6,164 households, across 33 habitations.
Deep Tubewell, Shallow Tubewell
Poonamallee is assessed safe. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.
30 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.
Safe on 2026-08-10. 171 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.
Place and boundary
The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.
- LGD Panchayat code
- 229648
- Block
- Villivakkam
- District
- Tiruvallur
- Mapped area
- 305.946 ha
- Centroid
- 13.0505, 80.1535
Habitations
JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.
| Habitation | Population | Households | Tap connections |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alangar Nagar | 900 | 175 | 175 |
| Andal Nagar | 4,825 | 525 | 525 |
| Arunachalam Nagar | 900 | 200 | 200 |
| Balaji Nagar | 1,200 | 120 | 120 |
| Dhanalakshmi | 500 | 170 | 170 |
| Dharmaraja Nagar | 1,500 | 220 | 220 |
| Ganapathy Nagar | 3,025 | 375 | 375 |
| Jayalakshmi Nagar | 220 | 50 | 50 |
| Jayaram Nagar | 1,800 | 120 | 120 |
| Kamadhenu Nagar | 800 | 180 | 180 |
| Kamatchiamman Nagar | 1,300 | 230 | 230 |
| Kandamapuram | 800 | 95 | 95 |
| Kandasamy Nagar | 1,300 | 210 | 210 |
| Kanniyamman Nagar | 2,200 | 350 | 350 |
| Krishnanagar | 100 | 21 | 21 |
| Mettukuppam | 2,150 | 350 | 350 |
| Odama Nagar | 3,800 | 460 | 460 |
| Om Sakthi Nagar | 300 | 55 | 55 |
| Palaniappa Nagar | 480 | 75 | 75 |
| Porur Garden Phase -i | 800 | 190 | 190 |
| Porur Garden Phase -ii | 600 | 170 | 170 |
| Rajarajan Nagar | 50 | 42 | 42 |
| Ramalinga Nagar | 1,000 | 220 | 220 |
| Ratna Nagar | 800 | 75 | 75 |
| Samayapuram Nagar | 400 | 190 | 190 |
| Shekmaniam | 2,500 | 470 | 470 |
| Shri Kamachiamman Nagar | 200 | 40 | 40 |
| Swami Vivekananda Nagar | 250 | 72 | 72 |
| Thirumurthy Nagar | 400 | 50 | 50 |
| Vallalar Nagar | 416 | 27 | 27 |
| Valliamman Nagar | 450 | 170 | 170 |
| Vanagaram | 2,200 | 417 | 417 |
| Venkateswara Nagar | 250 | 50 | 50 |
Where the water comes from
The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.
| Source | Category | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Tubewell | Ground Water | 23 |
| Shallow Tubewell | Ground Water | 7 |
Groundwater, projected from the taluk
IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.
Poonamallee taluk, by centroid in taluk.
Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.
Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.
The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.
Tanks and water bodies
Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.
3 water bodies cover 3.3 ha here, the largest of them 1.8 ha. The register names 2 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.
Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.
| Registered by | Water bodies |
|---|---|
| DOSS | 2 |
| AED | 1 |
Water-quality testing
171 samples between 2022-12-28 and 2026-08-10. 119 were taken at a source and 52 at households.
None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.
| Year | Samples |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 |
| 2023 | 48 |
| 2024 | 42 |
| 2025 | 58 |
| 2026 | 3 |
What is missing
14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.
Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.
- drinking water reliability
- historical water access
- groundwater level observation
- groundwater level trend
- aquifer context
- catchment context
- water body condition
- waterway network
- flood hazard
- observed flood events
- natural drainage
- wastewater service
These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.
- surface water change
- engineered stormwater drainage
- wastewater treatment assets
- pollution pressure inventory
- measured water pollution
- coastal and estuarine
- historical agricultural baseline
- current crop and irrigation state
- soil water context
- agricultural water system relation
- crop water demand
- agricultural water stress observation
- agricultural water pollution pressure
- composite priority score