Gram Panchayat|LGD 218801Water profile

Hulkooru

Part of Kolar Gold Field block, Kolar district.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

79.04 percent of households report a tap connection, and Kolar Gold Field is assessed over exploited at 190.6 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

79.04%
Households with a tap connection

1,380 of 1,746 households, across 14 habitations.

116
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

190.6%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Kolar Gold Field is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

61.9 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-20 and 2026-09-19, modelled rather than gauged.

109d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-06-02. 163 samples over 5 years, 5 recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The marker is the centre of the villages the register lists under this Panchayat, drawn by DataMeet. The LGD export lists 286 of the district's 1,825 villages under its 154 Panchayats, one or two each, so the union of a Panchayat's listed villages is not its extent: no outline or area is drawn until the full village-to-Panchayat mapping is on file.

LGD Panchayat code
218801
Block
Kolar Gold Field
District
Kolar
Centroid
13.0713, 78.3474
Loading map
Plotted from the centre of the DataMeet polygons of the villages the register lists under this Panchayat. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; no outline is drawn.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
GUTTAHALLY1995555
HULKUR630170130
VENKATAPURA3609560
KAVARAGANAHALLY4699292
KODIHALLY4617979
DODDAKARI800210210
KOTHUR4607979
BETKUR1,0072150
BATRAKUPPA4598931
NAYANAHALLY4949880
SIDDAREDDYDINNE625125125
HANGALA1,412248248
MARASANDRA751121121
VADDAHALLI4317070

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water116

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Kolar Gold Field taluk, by village subdistrict code.

190.6%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Kolar Gold Field
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluk the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluk IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the taluks themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Water-quality testing

163 samples between 2022-12-08 and 2026-06-02. 119 were taken at a source and 44 at households.

5 were recorded unsafe.

YearSamples
20221
2023102
202418
202520
202622

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping. Summed over only the villages the register lists under this Panchayat, not all of its villages.

40.14 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 85.64 ha total.

40.14 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 7.98 ha, tanks 1.8 ha.

3.63 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 9.96 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009. Read from only the villages the register lists under this Panchayat.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 4 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: tankPondLake.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

13 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (13)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • place boundary
  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score