Gram Panchayat|LGD 189397Water profile

Morve

Part of Khandala block, Satara district.

Within limits

Universal taps on a source still within its limit

All 509 households report a tap connection and Khandala remains assessed safe at 66.5 percent of extraction.

100%
Households with a tap connection

509 of 509 households, across 6 habitations.

1
Drinking-water sources

Open Well

66.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing talukataluka projection

Khandala is assessed safe. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.

60.4 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

30 rain days between 2026-08-02 and 2026-09-01, modelled rather than gauged.

67d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-06-26. 30 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent is DataMeet's community digitisation of the 2001 Census village map (ODbL), joined to the 2011 codes and dissolved to each Panchayat's member villages, so the place on the map is the place the register describes.

LGD Panchayat code
189397
Block
Khandala
District
Satara
Mapped area
1,117.577 ha
Centroid
18.0728, 74.0866
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the DataMeet polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is indicative (a 2001-era digitisation), not a survey boundary. The 12 small markers are the water bodies the First Census of Water Bodies recorded in this Panchayat's villages, at the coordinates its enumerators entered.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Jagtap/dhaigude Wasti1432222
Magas Wasti2835151
Mokashiwasti1653838
Morve1,535339339
Padalkarwasti2154949
Patilwasti1431010

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Open WellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluka

IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

safe
taluka categorytaluka projection

Khandala taluka, by village subdistrict code.

66.5%
stage of extraction, talukataluka projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Khandala
containing revenue talukataluka projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Tanks and water bodies

Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.

12 water bodies are on the census return for this Panchayat: 11 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams, 1 tank. 12 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.

The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. None of them is named in the return, which reads as a structure register rather than a survey of tanks and lakes.

Census classWater bodies
Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams11
Tank1
Owned byWater bodies
State WRD/State Irrigation11
Co-operative1

Water-quality testing

30 samples between 2022-11-11 and 2026-06-26. 29 were taken at a source and 1 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20222
20236
20246
20256
202610

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

872.77 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,117 ha total.

734.77 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 138 ha, tanks 0 ha.

217.23 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 5 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score