Gram Panchayat|LGD 190108Water profile

Kurvali Bk.

Part of Phaltan block, Satara district.

Within limits

Universal taps on a source still within its limit

All 565 households report a tap connection and Phaltan remains assessed safe at 61.5 percent of extraction.

100%
Households with a tap connection

565 of 565 households, across 14 habitations.

7
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well

61.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing talukataluka projection

Phaltan is assessed safe. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.

453d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2025-06-05. 49 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Adalgalewasti701212
Babarwasti4588
Boudhwasti2785454
Dhangarwada1092121
Gatkulwadi1021919
Jambhalichamala1001919
Karnewasti711212
Kurvali Bk.2745454
Londhewasti2966
Nalawadewasti861717
Nale/devakar Wasti681212
Pawarwasti961919
Salwasti531010
Datta Nagar1,483302302

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Open WellGround Water6
Deep TubewellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluka

IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

safe
taluka categorytaluka projection

Phaltan taluka, by village subdistrict code.

61.5%
stage of extraction, talukataluka projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Phaltan
containing revenue talukataluka projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Tanks and water bodies

Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.

15 water bodies are on the census return for this Panchayat: 14 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams, 1 tank. 15 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.

The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. None of them is named in the return, which reads as a structure register rather than a survey of tanks and lakes.

Census classWater bodies
Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams14
Tank1
Owned byWater bodies
State WRD/State Irrigation15

Water-quality testing

49 samples between 2022-09-19 and 2025-06-05. 49 were taken at a source and 0 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20224
202318
202420
20257

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

755.47 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,285 ha total.

246.35 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 509.12 ha, tanks 0 ha.

1,176.6 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 66.28 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

3 source types were recorded for the year and 3 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

12 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (14)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • place boundary
  • drinking water reliability
  • current rainfall
  • rainfall anomaly
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score